I used to be on their mailing list!

Mossack Fonseca. A couple of weeks ago no one other than a few journalists with a big secret and the odd firm of accountants would have come across the name. It’s a bit different now.

It seems a whistleblower released about a terabyte of computer data from within the organisation (that’s the total capacity of the hard drive of most desktop/laptop computers nowadays).

I understand the investigative journalists received the information around a year ago and it has taken all this time to turn it into something understandable.

I find the story fascinating for several reasons:

  • the story blows a very large hole in the secret offshore world of trusts and the like,
  • the gradual change over the last few years amongst the “average” person as to what is acceptable tax planning and what is not, and
  • that feeling of glee when politician X or celebrity Y is squirming in the spotlight!

Easily pleased me.

To a large extent the world of the super-rich has brought matters onto itself. Whether it was David Cameron or George Osborne who said “we are all in it together” or whether it was someone else, it has become remarkably plain that we bl**dy well are not!

Forgive me if this is a misquote but I believe I heard recently that the 85 richest people in the world own the same as the poorest 50% of the population!

I’m not a fan of trickle down of wealth. Estimate of the sums of money squirreled away in tax havens runs into hundreds of trillions of US dollars – enough to wipe out the indebtedness of all the poorer nations on earth.

It may be simplistic but – if you give someone who is not well off £100 they are likely to go and spend it (forget questions of imports, balance of payments, etc. for the moment) whereas the more well off person is likely to save it. The act of spending it will help another person find employment (once enough people do it) and so on and so on…

If anybody thinks I am wrong, I welcome the conversation.

Once it gets to the super-rich, there is a limit to the number of yachts/butlers/houses * (* – delete as necessary) one can spend the money on. You just have to wait until there is a wastrel generation who blow the lot before the dosh gets back into circulation.

Another way of thinking about it is the state of the NHS/roads/local services, etc., etc. If more people (and corporates such as Google, Amazon, etc.) pay their taxes in a low tax or no tax environment, then – unless you are willing to cut services even further (and I know a lot of people who think that is the way to go – bless) the only way will be to take more money off of YOU.

Moral accountant? Must be a USP…

I shall await further revelations with interest!

hard-drive-592204_1280